World Debate Collective

Public standards · updated 11 September 2026

Trust is part
of the work.

These are the standards behind our resources, opportunity listings, community spaces, partnerships, and AI Coach. If we fall short, tell us plainly.

Report an issue →

Our commitments

What you can
hold us to.

01

Dates need a source.

Competition and program dates labelled confirmed must come from the organiser’s official website or published rules. Recurring windows without current dates are labelled estimated. Every listing links to the official page, which remains the final authority.

02

Corrections stay visible.

When a material date, eligibility rule, cost, or claim is wrong, we correct it promptly and update the page date. Send evidence to info@worlddebatecollective.org. We do not quietly preserve a claim we know is unreliable.

03

Students come before growth.

We do not sell student contact information. Community spaces must be appropriate for young people: no harassment, discrimination, intimidation, sexual content, doxxing, or exploitative recruitment. Serious safeguarding concerns are escalated and access may be removed immediately.

04

AI is support, not authority.

AI Coach can help structure cases, test rebuttals, and improve drafts. It can be wrong. Users should verify factual claims and citations. The Coach must not impersonate a participant, fabricate evidence, or replace a student’s own judgment. API credentials remain server-side.

05

Commercial ties are disclosed.

Paid placements, sponsors, referral relationships, and material partner support are labelled near the relevant content. Payment does not buy a higher opportunity rating or editorial endorsement.

06

Access is a requirement.

We aim for keyboard access, readable contrast, responsive layouts, useful alternative text, and reduced-motion support. If a WDC page blocks you, contact us with the page, device, and assistive technology used.

Accountability

Specific criticism
makes the work better.

Include the page URL, the claim or behaviour at issue, and any supporting source. We review corrections, safety reports, accessibility problems, and conflicts of interest.

Email the standards desk →